News
 International
   Global Views
   Asia-Pacific
   America
   Europe
   Middle East & Africa
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 Cartoons/Comics/Humor
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  America
Driving in English Only?
Special Contribution
By Domenico Maceri

Drivers who obtained licenses from non-English exams are a threat to public safety, according to K. C. McAlpin, executive director of ProEnglish, an English advocacy group based in Arlington, Virginia. McAlpin made the statement in support of a lawsuit that would prevent Alabama from offering driver's license tests in languages other than English.

I took my first driver's license test in Italian more than thirty years ago in New Jersey.

I was not a threat to other motorists when I began driving because of my limited English or because I took the test in Italian.

The fact is that I have been lucky not to have any serious accidents in my entire driving record. Language has little to do with it in spite of the fact that I speak four of them.

McAlpin believes that people who took the tests in a foreign language cannot read he road signs.

Of course, that is not true. Driver's license tests in foreign language include the rules of the road according to state laws but also include reading and comprehension of English language signs.

McAlpin has probably never looked at tests in foreign languages so he is shooting from the hip when he adds that "you can't print road signs in 14 languages."

You don't have to.

McAlpin's logic might apply to foreign tourists who drive on America's roads and quite likely took their driver's tests in languages other than English.

Does he want to declare international driver's licenses illegal in America also?

The lawsuit in question was filed in Alabama by five members of ProEnglish, which the advocacy group is supporting. If successful, it would mean that the Alabama immigrant population would not be able to take the tests in the 14 languages it's given. These include Spanish, Thai, Chinese, Arabic, Persian, Vietnamese, American Sign Language, etc.

Why do Alabama and many other American states give driver's license tests in a variety of languages?

The answers are pretty obvious. We want all drivers to be tested so that they know the rules of the road. One need not know the English language to drive an automobile.

By giving immigrants the opportunity to take a driver's license test in their language, we make it easy for them to integrate.

The ability to drive a car means transportation, which allows people to go to work, shop, take their kids to school, and also go to school themselves and learn English.

The lack of driver's licenses would mean being stuck in a neighborhood where English may not be widely spoken and little interaction with Americans.

One would think that ProEnglish advocates, who claim to want people to learn English, would favor concepts and approaches, which help them learn the language of the country.

There are several national groups who claim to defend the English language in the US. Some of these groups even make some effort at encouraging immigrants to learn English.

Yet, they all have one thing in common which is most evident in the history in US English, from which ProEnglish spun off—their anti-immigrant stance which sometimes comes to the surface.

It did so when John Tanton, now on the board of ProEnglish, was the chairman of US English and wrote repugnant statements against Hispanics and Catholics.

Walter Cronkite who was on the board of US English resigned in embarrassment in 1998.

Conservative Linda Chavez, who eventually became chair of US English, also resigned because of the group's anti-immigrant and anti-Hispanic leanings.

There is no doubt that knowledge of English is valuable and indeed indispensable to succeed in the US.

However, giving immigrants driver's license tests in their languages is not a threat to the English language or Americans. The ability to drive legally and the immigrants' languages are an asset for our country in a global world which is getting smaller and smaller.



Related Articles
    Trump's Tiny Heart and DACA's Repeal
    Yesterday's Immigrants: Better Than Today's?
    Trump's Alternative Reality on Immigration: a ...
    Kaine's Español: Not Just Empty ...
    Immigration: The Supreme Court Hands GOP a ...
    Trump's Tax Returns: Our Business?
    Trump's Wall is Full of Holes
    Angry Latino Voters Will Deny Trump the ...
    Bilingualism and US Presidents
    Cruz: A "Canadian" for the US Presidency?
    Spanish in the US: Just an Immigrant Language?
    US Border Enforcement Bil Too Tough, Unwise
    Freedom of Speech in English Only?
    The GOP: No Guest Worker Program?
    Tancredo: the Ugly Face of the GOP?
    Rights for Illegal immigrants?
    Healthcare for All?
    No English, No Service?
    When Language Knowledge Means Security
    Enough Undocumented Workers?
    Bilingual Principals?
    Domestic Workers: Family Members?
    Mexico in US
    Tongue-Tied Bush?
    Is Immigration a Local Affair?
    Voting Rights in Español
    Profiting from Illegal Immigration?
    Job Safety for All?
    When English Only Discriminates
    Border Control with Songs?
    Guilty Parents, Innocent Children?
    Only One Language for America?
    George Bush: Already Lame Duck?
    A Comprehensive Immigration Bill That Works
    Language as Integration
    Illegal Workers Saving Social Security?
    Learning Languages the Easy Way?
    English-Only Laws: Why?
    Arnold Schwarzenegger: Pete Wilson II?
    Language Fluency Means Security
    Stingy Government But Generous People

Other Articles by Domenico Maceri
    Trump's Tiny Heart and DACA's Repeal
    Yesterday's Immigrants: Better Than Today's?
    Trump's Alternative Reality on Immigration: ...
    Kaine's Español: Not Just Empty ...
    Immigration: The Supreme Court Hands GOP a ...


Domenico Maceri, Ph.D., UC Santa Barbara, teaches foreign languages at Allan Hancock College in Santa Maria, CA. His articles have appeared in many newspapers including Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Japan Times, and The Seoul Times. Some of his stories won awards from the National Association of Hispanic Publications.

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6 Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 02-555-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange