News
 International
 National
 Embassy News
 Arts & Living
 Business
 Travel & Hotel
 Medical Tourism New
 Taekwondo
 Media
 Letters to Editor
 Photo Gallery
 Cartoons/Comics/Humor
 News Media Link
 TV Schedule Link
 News English
 Life
 Hospitals & Clinics
 Flea Market
 Moving & Packaging
 Religious Service
 Korean Classes
 Korean Weather
 Housing
 Real Estate
 Home Stay
 Room Mate
 Job
 English Teaching
 Translation/Writing
 Job Offered/Wanted
 Business
 Hotel Lounge
 Foreign Exchanges
 Korean Stock
 Business Center
 PR & Ads
 Entertainment
 Arts & Performances
 Restaurants & Bars
 Tour & Travel
 Shopping Guide
 Community
 Foreign Missions
 Community Groups
 PenPal/Friendship
 Volunteers
 Foreign Workers
 Useful Services
 ST Banner Exchange
  National
Iraq: Let the U.N. Clean Up the Mess
Special Contribution to The Seoul Times
By Domenico Maceri
The almost daily deaths of American soldiers and the missing weapons of massive destruction remind us that the Iraqi adventure was a huge mistake. The situation is getting worse by the day and Bush would be very smart to claim victory and let the U.N. bring about peace in the troubled country.

Although the major hostilities in Iraq have been over for several months in part because of the superior ability and materiel of the American soldiers, bringing peace and nation building are beyond the resources of our country.

American soldiers in Iraq are very vulnerable to the guerrilla warfare which is continuing. It뭩 not clear whether their attackers are terrorists who entered Iraq from other countries or Iraqis loyal to Saddam Hussein. In any case, our soldiers are in danger because the enemy is not a traditional army, which is what our soldiers have been trained to fight.

In addition, the limited number of soldiers and the military commitments all over the world means that American soldiers in Iraq are tired and ready to come home. Some soldiers have complained bitterly about having to stay in Iraq much longer than their leaders had predicted.

Aside from the human investment, the price tag for the reconstruction is turning out to be significantly higher than originally anticipated. The 87 billion dollars Bush requested to rebuild Iraq and which Congress has approved, shocked many Americans. Spending that amount to rebuild a country, which Americans view as having one of the richest oil reserves in the world, makes people wonder why we are not spending the money to fix our own infrastructure.

What makes the price tag shocking is also the sorry state of the economy since Bush became president. In spite of Bush뭩 huge tax cuts, the economy is very shaky and the budget deficit may reach 500 billion dollars. The general feeling is that we cannot afford to rebuild Iraq.

Courtesy Warblog
Bush has made an appeal to the U.N. and asked for help in dealing with the situation in Iraq. Yet, in his proposal he pretty much wanted help but also wanted to retain control of the country.

In essence, he wants the U.N. to bail him out, but so far the response has been negative. Only a handful of countries have pledged to help militarily or economically. Most of the 14 billion dollars pledged at the Madrid conference consists of loans.

In spite of Bush뭩 unilateral action in Iraq, the U.N. has little choice but to provide help. Its role in the world is to promote peace and it뭩 very good at it. But even if the U.N. takes over the major responsibilities in Iraq, the task is not going to be easy. The challenge will be to find countries willing to send soldiers, which will not be viewed by Iraqis as having ulterior motives.

Thus, Turkish soldiers would be unacceptable to the Kurds. Also unacceptable would be soldiers from countries which have economic interests in Iraq. That would include France, Germany, and Russia, which had signed economic deals with the Saddam Hussein regime and would like them to be honored.

American companies, which have been given contracts by the Bush administration to rebuild Iraq, are in the same dubious situation. In essence, Iraqis need to feel that whoever goes to help them, has no political or economic designs in their country.

The Iraqi war has been a learning experience. The initial military "success" made people think that similar military interventions could occur in other countries, notably Syria, Iran, or North Korea. Although the hawks in the Bush administration might have had plans for such military actions, the situation in Iraq and the cost will certainly temper those plans.

Courtesy 쟕V8.com
For Bush, the question will be whether he wants to have a chance at being reelected or remain captive of political miscalculations. With a continuing sputtering economy, the country will not be in the mood to keep pouring money in Iraq while American soldiers continue to die daily.

Making significant progress in Iraq is doable by letting the U.N. take over and bring our soldiers home. That would relieve our country from a huge financial obligation and political mess.

Unfortunately, Bush seems to be stuck and unwilling to change course. If Americans re-elect him, we뭠l be in Iraq for a very long time. It뭩 likely, however, that unless things change dramatically, our troops will come home because a Democrat will occupy the White House. President Dean?



Other Articles by Domenico Maceri
    Trump's Tiny Heart and DACA's Repeal
    Yesterday's Immigrants: Better Than Today's?
    Trump's Alternative Reality on Immigration: ...
    Kaine's Español: Not Just Empty ...
    Immigration: The Supreme Court Hands GOP a ...


Domenico Maceri, Ph.D., UC Santa Barbara, teaches foreign languages at Allan Hancock College in Santa Maria, CA. His articles have appeared in many newspapers including Los Angeles Times, Washington Times, Japan Times, and The Seoul Times. Some of his stories won awards from the National Association of Hispanic Publications.

 

back

 

 

 

The Seoul Times Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6 Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea 04337 (ZC)
Office: 02-555-6188 Email:seoultimes@gmail.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company  ST Banner Exchange