None of My Business
President of The Seoul Times
People used to think that it took a lot of energy to get an engine started and so it was more fuel efficient to leave the engine running even for long periods, while the vehicle was stationary, rather than switch off and then re-start. But modern engines are not like that. And the really fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles actually do turn themselves off when not needed.This is a subject close to my heart and indeed last year I did try to mount a one-man campaign to try to persuade people to turn off their engines when waiting. There have been similar campaigns – far more successful than mine – in other cities around the world. New York City is one. It is actually illegal to have a car idle its engine for more than one minute.Seoul City actually also has regulations against idling and there are fines which are imposed on those found in breach of the rule. But in practice laws are not much help if people ignore them and they do ignore them when they cannot see their relevance or importance.I am sorry to say that I have given up on trying to persuade the drivers of my neighbors’ cars not to leave the engine on – sometimes for an hour or more – while waiting outside the house for the owner to come out. I guess the anger of the owner on getting into a slightly chillier car in winter or a slightly warmer one in summer is a lot more fearsome than all my logical reasoning.But here are some interesting facts which, if the owners of those vehicles were aware of, would be powerfully persuasive on the side of arguing in favor of stopping idling.In Canada, a study calculated that eliminating idling for more than one minute could save the country 630 million liters of gasoline each year. It would also lessen the amount of carbon dioxide (that lethal gas, CO2) by 1.4 million tones every year.So not only would we be saving energy costs, we would also be improving the environment if we were all to avoid idling.And we could also be slowing down the process of global warming. We would also not need to fill the gas tank so often, since five minutes of idling equates to travelling about four kilometers in terms of the use of fuel.It is difficult to imagine that, in the context of a calm and well-informed debate, there could be any rational argument put forward in favor of idling.One man campaigns are perhaps not the most effective method of persuasion. But in Korea I have noticed that the mass population can be swayed to change even long-practiced habits as a result of a sustained public campaign. So I believe there is hope.The reason I gave up my efforts was that on one occasion I approached the driver of a large SUV in a car park who was sitting in his car and talking on the mobile phone. The engine had been running for at least five minutes and so I asked politely how long he intended to keep it running. The driver was a foreigner, like me.With a scowl on his face he informed me it was none of my business and encouraged me in far from polite language to go away!So I still seethe inside when I see, hear and smell cars waiting outside dwellings with the engine running, standing outside schools waiting for the children to come out and emitting exhaust fumes into the play area, congregating in car parks of hotels with the drivers asleep in a fully air-conditioned or warmly heated atmosphere. But I do nothing.I guess the reaction of most people is still that saving the earth for the future generations is “none of my business.” Maybe that is why we have reached the state of the world when polar ice caps are reducing and glaciers have started to disappear.Korea is not a country where ordinary citizens are apt to take action for safety's sake, which is possibly why we have seen so many avoidable disastrous accidents recently. All it takes is leadership- one loud voice shouting "we're going to sink"! Or " the grating is going to collapse" or "that's too much weight for the roof to bear"... That, plus a lot of others prepared to listen and to make it their business!
Joseph J. Day MBE Dies of Cancer in Seoul
"S. Korea Not Backward But President Is!"
bRexit: a Denial of History
An Open Letter to Mayor Park Won-Soon!
Seoul Mayor Park Won-Soon Meets Foreigners
Town Meetings for Foreign Residents of Seoul
Protection of Diplomats
The Solution to Learning English
Hangeul: A Reassessment
King Sejong and Hangeul
War Becomes Real in Clint Eastwood's True ...
An Ode to the People of Korea
Strong Won or Weak Dollar?
Baloons, Drones, Satire, and Free Speech
"International Market (Ode to My Father)," ...
Terror as Tool of Censorship
A Very Happy New Year 2015!
The Annals of the Chosun Dynasty
The Catholic Martyrs of Korea
Bridges over the Han River: A Tale of Two ...
Democracy in Action in Seoul
An Open Letter to Administrator of Cultural ...
Jeongneung Royal Tomb
Seo Jai Pil, Founder of “The Independent”
WTO Head Proud of Bali Agreement
Korean "Oxbridge" Forum Inaugurated in Seoul
The Waters of Seoul -- Han River
"How We Will Remember You"
Kim Gu, Independence Fighter
Korean Local Government Has Matured, ...
Seoul Subway Forces Senior Expats to Subsidize ...
Syngman Rhee, 1st President of Republic of ...
Ernest Bethell -- Champion of a Free Press
Homer Hulbert – A Foreign Korean Patriot
Korea's Own "Mini Winter Olympics"
Happy "Valentine's Day"
Cheongwadae -- A Blue-Hued Power House
Bangkok Shutdown? Hardly!
US Vice President Biden Speaks in Seoul
The Annals of Kings and Presidents
Cultural Values in Korea
Of Dukes and Hazard
State Visit -- Tripping the Light Fantastic
Seoul Mayor Park Won-Soon Awards Honorary ...
Alan Timblick serves as President of The Seoul Times. He grew up in England, graduated from Oxford University, and has lived in Seoul for over three decades. A former banker, he also worked for the Korean government as head of Invest Korea and for Seoul City as head of the Seoul Global Center.
The Seoul Times
Shinheungro 25-gil 2-6
Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea
Office: 02-555-6188 Email:email@example.com
Copyrights 2000 The Seoul Times Company ST Banner Exchange